Homework Assignment
#1:
Read
excerpts from the fields of Astronomy, Geology, Paleontology, and the Biology
(Reilly, Worlds of History). Create your timelines for each of these fields of vision choosing events,
or benchmarks, to place on the timelines in patterns that may stimulate
thought, questions, or even answers to questions. Write a short paragraph at
the end of each timeline discussing some advantages and disadvantages of each
for understanding human history. Turn-in your timelines by the next class
period.
Astronomy Instructions: The astronomer Carl Sagan
was one of the great popularizers of science in the
twentieth century. In this selection from one of his book, Dragons of Eden,
he finds a simple way to demonstrate the vastness of Earth's history. He plots
the history of the planet on a calendar for a single year and, in this
framework, he notes that the first humans appeared at
Transfer some of the important dates of Sagan's
calendar to a time line. Draw a 12-inch line horizontally on a piece of paper,
marking inch designations. The Big Bang is at the left end (0), and today is at
the right end (12). Your world history course will deal only with the last hour
on Sagan's log of events Łor December 31. Where would
that be on your time line? Where would you place your own life on this time
line? Where would you place the life of one of your grandparents? What is the
major disadvantage of a time line drawn to this scale? What is its advantage?
The
world is very old, and human beings are very young. Significant events in our
personal lives are measured in years or less; our lifetimes in decades; our
family genealogies in centuries; and all of recorded history in millennia. But
we have been preceded by an awesome vista of time, extending for prodigious
periods into the past, about which we know little -both because there are no
written records and because we have real difficulty in grasping the immensity
of the intervals involved.
Yet we are able to date events in the remote past. Geological
stratification and radioactive dating provide information on archaeological, paleontological, and geological events; and astrophysical
theory provides data on the ages of planetary surfaces, stars, and the Milky
Way Galaxy, as well as an estimate of the time that has elapsed since that
extraordinary event called the Big Bang -an explosion that involved all of the
matter and energy in the present universe. The Big Bang may be the beginning of
the universe, or it may be a discontinuity in which information about the
earlier history of the universe was destroyed. But it is certainly the earliest
event about which we have any record.
The most instructive way I know to express this cosmic chronology is to
imagine the fifteen-billion-year lifetime of the universe (or at least its
present incarnation since the Big Bang) compressed into the span of a single
year. Then every billion years of Earth history would correspond to about
twenty-four days of our cosmic year, and one second of that year to 475 real
revolutions of the Earth about the sun. [Following] I present the cosmic chronology
in three forms: a list of some representative pre-December dates; a calendar
for the month of December; and a closer look at the late evening of New Year's
Eve. On this scale, the events of our history books -even books that make
significant efforts to de-provincialize the present
-- are so compressed that it is necessary to give a second-by-second recounting
of the last seconds of the cosmic year. Even then, we find events listed as
contemporary that we have been taught to consider as widely separated in time.
In the history of life, an equally rich tapestry must have been woven in other
periods -for example, between
The chronology corresponds to the best evidence now available. But some
of it is rather shaky. No one would be astounded if, for example, it turns out
that plants colonized the land in the Ordovician rather than the Silurian
Period; or that segmented worms appeared earlier in the Precambrian Period than
indicated. Also, in the chronology of the last ten seconds of the cosmic year,
it was obviously impossible for me to include all significant events; I hope I
may be excused for not having explicitly mentioned advances in art, music, and
literature or the historically significant American, French, Russian, and
Chinese revolutions.
The construction of such tables and calendars is inevitably humbling. It
is disconcerting to find that in such a cosmic year the Earth does not condense
out of interstellar matter until early September; dinosaurs emerge on
Christmas Eve; flowers arise on December 28th; and men and women originate at
Pre December Dates (approximate)
Big Bang |
January 1 |
Cosmic Calendar / December
SUNDAY |
MONDAY |
TUESDAY |
WEDNESDAY |
THURSDAY |
FRIDAY |
SATURDAY |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
Cosmic Calendar / December 31, last 12 hours
Origin of Proconsul and Ramapithecus, probable ancestors of apes and men |
--1:30 P.M |
First Humans |
-- |
Widespread use of tools |
|
Domestication of fire by Peking man |
|
Beginning of most recent glacial period |
|
Seafarers settle |
|
Extensive cave painting in |
|
Invention of agriculture |
|
Neolithic civilization; first cities |
|
First dynasties in |
|
Invention of the alphabet; Akkadian Empire |
|
Hammurabic legal codes in |
|
Bronze metallurgy; Mycenaen culture; Trojan War; Olmec culture; invention of the compass |
|
Iron metallurgy; First Assyrian Empire; |
|
Asokan |
|
Euclidean geometry; Archimedean physics; Ptolemaic
astronomy; |
|
Zero and decimals invented in Indian arithmetic; |
|
Mayan civilization; Sung Dynasty |
|
Renaissance in |
|
Paleontology Instructions: Draw another timeline, including turning points that you, or the author, feel are significant using this field of vision.
Three Fossil Discoveries Clarify
the Murky Origins of Life
from John Noble Wilford's "Three Fossil
Discoveries Clarify the Murky Origins of Life," New York Times,
This article from the New York Times was written to inform readers about developments in science. What current developments does the author report? What is the significance of the date for the first multi-cellular life forms? What was the "Cambrian Explosion" of life forms?
Life, as far as scientists can tell, gained a
foothold on earth almost as rising above its tell, gained a foothold on earth
almost as soon as possible, then took an exceedingly long time rising above its
simple origins, and finally, 530 million years ago, erupted in a springtime of
riotous proliferation. In an astonishingly brief time, insects, earthworms,
corals, sponges, mollusks, and animals with rudimentary backbones -all the
major body plans of today -made their first appearance in what is known as the
Cambrian Explosion.
But there are many yawning gaps in this early history of life, and so
scientists welcomed reports last week of three discoveries. The reports offered
important refinements in the timing of three events that have puzzled
scientists trying to reconstruct the mysterious first steps in the emergence of
life. The events are the introduction of large multi-cellular organisms, the
existence of some flat jellyfish-like organisms as possible predecessors of
Cambrian life, and the emergence of chordates, the core group of vertebrates
that would eventually include humans.
Dr. Steven M. Stanley, a paleontologist at
In the beginning, 4.6 billion years ago, the planet was covered with
molten rock and bombarded steadily by swarms of meteorites. Not until the
surface cooled down about 4 billion years ago could there be life, the first
evidence for which are 3.8 billion-year-old fossils of a kind of blue-green
algae similar to pond scum. These were simple organisms with single cells
lacking nuclei. It was apparently another 2 billion years before more complex
cells with nuclei evolved. Until recently, little evidence existed for
multi-cellular organisms before a billion years ago.
Now, digging in sediments in northern
The Chinese scientists acknowledged the discovery in
Writing in the current issue of the journal Science, Dr. Zhu Shixing and Dr. Chen Huineng of
the
Another discovery may solve the mystery of what has been called a
"broken link" in the poorly understood evolutionary chain prior to
the Cambrian Explosion.
For half a century, scientists have not known what to make of creatures
resembling jellyfish that were found in ancient sediments of the Ediacara Hills of southern
Applying more precise dating technologies to Ediacaran
fossils from the deserts of
"If Grotzinger and company are
correct, that's excellent news," Dr. Simon Conway Morris, a paleontologist
at
Scientists said the new evidence left open the possibility that there
was after all no broken link in the evolutionary chain and that Ediacaran organisms could have played a role in the development
of a multitude of flora and fauna that characterize the Cambrian period and are
the predecessors of life on earth today.
Dr. Samuel Bowring, an M.I. T. geologist on the research team, said,
"What this shows is that evolution likely proceeded smoothly as opposed to
having a period of evolution followed by an extinction, which would open
ecological niches allowing other life forms to develop."
The dating was done on grains of the mineral zircon found in trace
amounts in volcanic ash. By analyzing the decay rates of uranium into lead, the
geologists obtained dates for the fossil-bearing sediments that they say are
accurate to within plus or minus one million years, a refinement previously
unattainable on samples that old.
"Five to ten years ago, being able to date something to within five
million years was a major achievement," Dr. Bowring said. "The more
precisely we can resolve time, the more sophisticated the evolutionary
questions we can address. "
Dr. Stanley of Johns Hopkins suggested that the Ediacaran
fossil record might have been deceptive. Evidence for these soft-bodied
organisms from the sea floors was found in such profusion in sediments just
before the Cambrian period because nothing was scavenging on them at that time.
Then the fossils seemed to disappear. Was this the sign of a true extinction,
or merely an absence of fossil remains of that particular life? With the
greater diversity of life in the Cambrian, he said, there could have been many
scavengers munching on the Ediacara organisms before
they had a chance to become fossils.
The most abundant remains of animal life originating in the Cambrian
period are found in the Burgess Shale, fossil beds in the Canadian Rockies that
have been the main source of knowledge about this time. But for the last
decade, paleontologists have been mining an important new source at Chengjiang in the Chinese
An international team of scientists described finding what may be the
earliest known representative of the Chordate, the branch of the animal kingdom
that includes vertebrates and two lesser known allied forms of life. Previous
generations of scientists had thought that chordates evolved in the later
Ordovician geological period. Later evolution, they liked to think, could imply
advanced and special status to the branch of life leading to humans.
In a report in the journal Nature, Dr. Lars Ramskold,
a paleontologist at the
The researchers said Yunnanozoon appeared to
belong to the division of chordates known as cephalochordates, which are
closely related to backboned animals, including humans, but not of them.
Current representatives of the group include amphioxus, a shy marine creature.
The identification of the new specimen as a chordate will be
controversial, scientists said. The only other possible chordate from the
Cambrian period, the Pikaia from the Burgess Shale,
has not been described in a sufficiently detailed report and so has yet to be
accorded full scientific standing. But the discoverers of the Chengjiang fossil said that the presence of one division of
chordates in the Cambrian period indicated that the entire branch probably
existed then as well.
In a commentary accompanying the chordate report, Dr. Stephen Jay Could,
a Harvard paleontologist and evolutionary biologist, said the
"unambiguously identified chordate from the still earlier Chengjiang fauna now seals the fate" of previous
efforts to assert the specialness of human ancestry
by separating it from the herd of new Cambrian animal forms.
"So much for chordate uniqueness marked by slightly later evolution," he wrote." As for our place in the history of life, we are of it, not it."
Anthropology Introduction: Mary Kilbourne Matossian, "From
Hominids to Human Beings," in Shaping World History (Armonk, NY: M.
E. Sharpe, 1997),9-14
Here are some hints to help you construct your timeline: What, according
to the author, happened in
Draw a time line specific to this selection. Mark the left-most notch " 5 million years ago," then add ten equally
spaced notches, ending with "today" on the far right. Label notches
in increments of 0.5 million years. Now plot the major dates referred to in the
article, indicating to what the dates refer.
If you were to extend this time line to include 15 million years
ago-using the same incremental scale -how many pages more would you need? If
you wanted to include the dates mentioned in this chapter's first selection by
Carl Sagan, how many pages more would you need? To
understand the geography of this selection, locate the
Anthropologists have named us Homo sapiens sapiens, the clever, clever hominid. Over a century ago
certain scientists abandoned the Western creation myth and began to seek human
origins in nature among the primates (apes and monkeys). If apes and people had
many resemblances, what kind of creatures linked the two species? When and
where did this linking happen?
The discoveries of physical anthropologists and geneticists have indeed
established that we belong to the primate family. The line of hominids (bipedal
apes, apes who walk on two legs) differentiated from
that of other apes about five million years ago. We share with chimpanzees and bonabos (pygmy chimpanzees) between 98 percent and 99
percent of our structural genes. Who can watch primates in a zoo without
experiencing a shock of recognition?
In December 1992 in
In August 1995 Mary Leakey and her team discovered in
About fifteen million years ago the environment in
This development had two major biological consequences. First, the
According to Peter Rodman and Henry McHenry, on the east side of the
There was probably a positive feedback loop between the expansion of the
hominid brain and meat eating. The hominid brain is three times as big as that
of an ape of similar body size. Meat is an excellent source of protein and,
because of its fat content, is high in calories; this helps to support the
larger brain. At the same time the growth of the brain in relation to body
weight favored the improvement of human hunting skills and higher meat
consumption. In hominid females, the pelvic opening widened to compensate for
the increased brain size of the hominid infant. However, that was not enough,
and any greater widening would reduce bipedal mobility. A solution to the
problem of increased hominid brain size was the natural selection of those
hominids that produced children born "too early," with brain size
only one third that of an adult. These infants are slow to mature and so depend
on their parents for a longer period. This extends the time that parents can
transmit culture (patterns of behavior) to their offspring. In contrast, baby
apes are born with a brain one half the size of that
of an adult ape. They mature more quickly than hominids do, but have fewer
years of dependency to learn from their parents.
What sort of culture did prehistoric humans transmit? Cultural
anthropologists who have studied the way of life of foragers (hunter-gatherers)
today say that the usual size of a human band is twenty-five persons, including
children and adults. A larger unit, the dialectical tribe, includes about five
hundred persons. Foragers use only temporary camps and move about on their
range. Since longevity was usually only twenty-five to thirty years, many children
were raised by relatives, their parents being dead. The band, not the nuclear
family, was the principal social unit. A band acquires food cooperatively, by
hunting and gathering, and shares it. Adults teach their children, who are born
self-centered, to become sensitive to the needs of others and to share food.
Is such sharing, social behavior unique to humans? Frans
de Waal, a researcher at the
However, chimpanzees share food and other treasures only when it is to
their advantage. They cheat when they can get away with it by hiding a private
stock of food. When cheating, they try to deceive other members of the group.
Fortunately, they live in groups of less than a hundred, so they can watch each
other and identify the cheaters. Older chimpanzees deny food to young cheaters
by excluding them from sharing in the next windfall.
It appears that both our moral and immoral tendencies are part of the
natural order. Both "good" and "evil" are aspects of our
adaptive and competitive strategies. We can imagine that human goodness
developed out of the need to adjust to a cooperative group. By belonging to
such a group an individual had a major advantage in the struggle to survive and
reproduce.
No more can we think of stone-tool making and sharing behavior as unique
to our species. Nor are we unique in our capacity for tactical deception and
savagery. Rather, we have a place in a natural mammalian continuum.
The only behavior unique to humans appears to be the ability to
communicate quickly with a large number of phonemes (
discrete sounds). We can make fifty phonemes; apes can make only twelve.
Humans can speak more quickly and articulately than any other species. The
placement of our vocal organs makes this possible. When did our ancestors
acquire spoken language involving more than twelve phonemes? Some
anthropologists think it was as far back as 2.5 million years ago (the time of Homo
habilis). Most agree that complex spoken language
goes back at least thirty-five thousand years to the time of the cave paintings
in
Recent discoveries in the Pavlov Hills of the
When did people exactly like us, anatomically speaking, appear?
Many anthropologists think that our species (Homo sapiens sapiens) differentiated around two hundred thousand
years ago in either south or northeast
They were especially lucky if the relationship between Land and water in
their region was favorable for water transportation, as the cost of moving bulk
goods by water for a given distance was one eighth to one twentieth that of
moving them by land. Waterborne commerce may have been just as fundamental as
the development of farming for the birth of civilization.